Volume 13: “The Law of Conservation Of Energy: A Long Stride on a Wrong Path, Part II Development of Thermodynamics and Modern Physics Length 350 pages

The failure of science to discover perpetual motion is rooted in philosophy and scientific works of Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Helmholtz and Einstein. Success of perpetual motion is rooted in first idea of religion (creation exnihlio) and mysticism which has its own history. Still almost from the very first, perpetual motion has been a major topic of philosophical reflection. The scientist’s misconception of perpetual motion is primarily due to his inability to draw the proper conclusions from his observations, but it is also strongly favored by the difficulty of visualizing what energy actually is....Therefore, without proper understanding of energy, it is misleading to speak of conservation of energy, because physicist’s view of world is rooted not only in a denial of perpetual motion but also in the ignorance of nature of energy itself. This volume deals with story of Origins of thermodynamics and erroneous establishment of laws of thermodynamics by Carnot, Mayer, Joule, Thompson, Helmholtz, Claussius, Lord Kelvin etc.
....It was erroneous to extend generalization made through experiment and observation on heat to the other parts of physics and therefore to universe. It has been demonstrated that mechanical equivalent of heat has no meaning. It is fundamental mistake to treat gravity as a mechanical force and employ vertical descent of objects as a standard to evolve various units of measurements of energy and work. Work done by an object over a closed path in perpetual motion system in a gravitation field is not zero.

....This book also presents you history of modern physics and critically examines the work of a generation of the scientist who has done harm to perpetual motion. Book demonstrates how Perpetual motion seriously contradicts famous Einstein’s equation: E = MC2. This volume also exposes limitations of quantum mechanics and particle physics. We would urge the reader to remember that all philosophy (therefore including all scientific theories) deals with the interpretations of f