|
Post by enSync on Nov 6, 2012 18:21:27 GMT -5
Due to new technology and materials coming out everyday I know for an absolute fact that real PM will be possible on Earth and 100% in Space. Friction is the number one key to PM as Physics states. I come here to say this simply for all that read this do not give up! I have found that many high-tech materials are fairly cheap to buy. It is only a small matter of time when Over Unity merges with Perpetual Motion. If you have an idea or making one try and get help and do keep it secret all at the same time. But do not become obsessed with it as that will lead to failure. Always take time to think even if it takes weeks on each and every thought that leads to the next step in your discovery. That in itself will keep one from making errors that can cost time and money that most of us do not have when we pursue inventing. And research all you can on your subject as that will lead to more ideas even as simple as an axle. Thought I would leave a motivational post since I found this site ;D
enSync
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Ramesh Menaria on Nov 9, 2012 19:14:25 GMT -5
Hi enSync
Thanks for your on invaluable thoughts on the perpetual motion more than possible. Of course motivation is the key to success.
Dr. Ramesh Menaria
|
|
|
Post by KRTKishore on Nov 21, 2012 2:44:51 GMT -5
Hi Mr. Ramesh Menaria, I have completed my physics graduation in 2002. but currently working in a s/w firm. However, i am facinated by physics and some thing as been pushing me on unlimited power, which could be a great benifit in saving the earth mainly and to give a healthy world to the future generations. I have been reading scientific articles and intrested on perpetual motions,zero point energy. unified theaory. light and vaccum.. and so on. As i was searching with vedic reference on the above topics especially. relativity.tripod.com/deva-ramananda-s-dynamics-of-perpetual-motion.html by relativity.tripod.com/deva-ramananda-s-dynamics-of-perpetual-motion.html by Deva Ramananda and is very good. I would like to have the books of reference and would wish to work with you on this. Please reply back. my mail id krtkishore @gmail.com Regards, Kishore
|
|
|
Post by kittyandjoe on Nov 22, 2012 13:39:27 GMT -5
22nd Nov 12 Thank you Dr Ramesh Menaria, I’ve just caught eye of this last correspondence you sent me some time ago, (got very absent-minded of late) & would like to update you & enlighten you as to my present position. Now I am 70yrs old, & live humbly, some 50km outside Dublin Ireland. First of all I define PM as continuous movement (even if slowly) what great men from the middle-ages strived for ok, I believe “Orffyreus” in his search for same, discovered something “beyond” PM, something wonderful: (from when started manually by hand, would “increase” in velocity to find a maximum, guaranteeing an everlasting hunger to work)
Why I brush aside “Bessler’s book of codes” (though to be honest I never read through them) is simply because the whole idea is “terribly” simple & I couldn’t see any sense in it being put into code. What I concentrate most on is the few words that Bessler spoke of in his description of workings of his machine, (so incredibly accurate & yet leaving one totally in the dark, as to his secret) One cannot exclude “the great Orffyreus” when in discussion of Perpetual Motion, he is surely the King, all others just had dreams, a great man was wronged by history, but then History was never kind to the truth,
Now I would like to explain my “particular” problem as to how I stand ok, I have an “Idea” about 30 yrs, & as I have stated before, it is of “a simple construction” (similar like to looking upon a two-wheel-cycle for the first time, & visualising it going into motion, discovering “balancing in motion” for the first time, & yet you will agree a very simple construction) (my idea draws from the ever-swilling-pool of gravity)
I am very conscious of the value, & possible effects of “unlimited Energy” & my desire is what benefit that gift could have to the third-World, & the under-privileged, like bringing clean water to the Desert, & heat into the frozen North, yet you can be sure Countries like the US would go through it with a fine-tooth-comb to find its military advantages.
Were I to display my simple plans on say a “projector” screen to a dozen enthusiastic, & interested men, I would expect less than half to visualize it in motion, at a first glance, simple as it may be, but what I really want is a way to display public, & to the World-audience in one shot, like a live-show on TV, & now at 70 I would love to reveal what I have, & get it off my shoulders . My idea is a machine, from its centre will cause drive on its own “outside” with a gear-change, will speed up to a maximum,
I fear of it falling into the hands of greedy individuals for profit, & strongly believe patent can’t protect it, (as it could be a system) Let me know your thoughts.
Regards Joe.
|
|
|
Post by Ramesh Menaria on Jan 2, 2013 15:30:43 GMT -5
Hi Joe, Thanks again for making a nice evaluation of Bessler’s work and looking it in a correct light. I can understand your problem. It is almost natural that Perpetual motion continues to have many problems with it until it gets successfully established by the inventor which is surely an uphill task for so many reasons which we all know. You are looking forward for displaying your invention to the world audience in one shot but I think that this idea would require a lot of prior support of different kinds to get materialized. I think it would be better and practical for you to approach university professors in your area and have a demonstration there at their department in presence of some leading scientific TV channel invited by you. If the recorded film is really of the value as you expect depending on your invention, it would have broadcast many many times to reach the world audience. . Try to manage this much, it would be equivalent to showing the invention to the world audience in one shot . All the Best wishes With regards
Dr Ramesh Menaria
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Ramesh Menaria on Jan 2, 2013 15:55:47 GMT -5
Hi Kishore,
Thanks for your interest in Vedic perpetual motion and Deva Ramananda. I am quite impressed to learn about you that at this very young age you have become interested in these fields of great value. You are most welcome to work with me but that depends on many things about my future plans in the field of perpetual motion and their success. When I am convinced that success in the field as I expect is certain and it could also benefit you, surely I would be glad to invite you to work with me. Regarding books, I shall inform you whenever they get published, but certainly after I finish all practical works on perpetual motion. All the best wishes.
Dr. Ramesh Menaria
|
|
|
Post by Jay Adams on Feb 12, 2013 1:26:25 GMT -5
Hi To any interested i have a theory so simple its crazy look at a pully system 2:1 ratio its created more with less effort. Im no science major im a carpenter 26 years old been interested since iv been 14 in perpetual motion. I built my first prototype that didnt work at 18 but developed my theory. I have now a far simpler design using water and its ability to become equal. id like to build a proper prototype the materials i used building this design was anything i could find garden hose drain pipe plastic bottles it leaked like a sive. So im basicly looking for somone with money to custom build desing who is as convinced as i am that the system i have is logical and will work to generate power using nothing but water and gravity with no loss of water. other than evaporation im from New Zealand my phone number is (64) (07) 8287066. my email doesnt get checked much but try jayada22@student.wintec.ac.nz or mail me 238 hangapipi rd rotowaro huntly North Island New Zealand
|
|
|
Post by Jay Adams on Feb 12, 2013 1:37:50 GMT -5
The secret is i belive that when your convinced about an idea when it doesnt work figure out how to make it work dont just accept it wont work. Every problem holds the seeds to its own solution.
|
|
|
Post by gkrouse on Aug 21, 2013 19:55:38 GMT -5
just joined and I cant figure out this site. this is the first place I found to write, so here goes. I solved the bessler wheel. I need assistance on how to reveal it without giving it away. I also need to get funding so I can get it built and patented. I ran out of money just as I was solving the final missing pieces to this amazing phenomenon of movement, mass and energy. Observers are going to kick themselves when they see how this works. Oh joy! How wonderful it is to see it move. Bessler was right. He was spot on with his witty riddle like story describing the elements which capture this amazing phenomenon of movement. "children swinging from broken columns...assisted by a weighted club".
please, can someone help steer me toward someone who can help offer advisement on this crucial stage. Without funding, this will never make it. That already happened once, lets not let it happen again.
Please hurry in your reply, I am busting at the seems holding this in.
thanks, greg
|
|
|
Post by G Wayne Eckman on Oct 3, 2013 18:29:34 GMT -5
I believe I have the knowledge that it would take to build a self- sustaining perpetual motion machine. I am computer illiterate and I need to talk to someone on an old fashioned telephone. My phone number is 724-354-3992. If this is impossible, please give me the name of a company that would sell me a perpetual motion machine that looks like a swing set which was pictured in the General science text books in the 1940's. I am 99.99% sure this will work.
|
|
|
Post by chuffmonkey on Dec 26, 2013 0:58:53 GMT -5
PM has been achieved, dismantled and destroyed.
Having created such a device, a patent will never be granted for it, as for some reason, the patent office states that patents will only be granted to devices that comply with the laws of thermo dynamics, and as we all know, these four laws clearly state that PMD's (Perpetual Motion Devices), are not possible.
Strange really, as these four laws were created 400 years ago, when science itself was in its dark age of infancy, and so much technology has been created since then.
Why does the patent office discriminate against PMD inventors?
|
|